Glossary

Fault-conforming grids

A fault-conforming grid is a mesh whose cell faces lie exactly on the fault surfaces, so a fault acts as a true internal boundary with its own transmissibility rather than a stair-stepped approximation.

Why faults are hard to grid

A fault is a break where rock has slipped, so layers on one side are offset — the throw — against different layers on the other. That creates three tangled problems for a grid:

  • Discontinuity: the geometry is not smooth, so cells cannot simply flow across the break.
  • Juxtaposition: offset puts different layers face to face — a permeable sand may now sit against shale, or against another sand — which sets whether fluids can cross at all.
  • Fault transmissibility: the fault rock itself, through smear and gouge, has its own conductivity, so the fault is a flow property, not just a surface. It can seal or conduct.

Non-conforming vs conforming

Structured corner-point grids keep a Cartesian index, so they represent a fault by stair-stepping the cell faces and wiring offset layers together with non-neighbor connections. The true fault plane is never an actual face, and the cells around it distort.

A fault-conforming grid does the opposite: it places cell faces exactly on the fault surface. The fault becomes a real internal boundary of the mesh, so:

  • a fault transmissibility multiplier applies to genuine faces,
  • juxtaposition is captured by the real cell adjacency across the fault, and
  • cells stay orthogonal and well-shaped, protecting two-point flux accuracy.

Unstructured PEBI/Voronoi grids achieve this because you can place nodes so their perpendicular-bisector faces land on the fault plane.

The build problem

Making Voronoi cells conform to a surface used to require clipping cells against it, which spawns slivers and degenerate cells — right where quality matters. That is the barrier VoroCrust (Dr. Mohamed Ebeida et al., ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2020) removed, providing a provably conforming polyhedral Voronoi mesh with no clipping.

How AutoMesh-Geo helps

AutoMesh-Geo applies this VoroCrust-style approach to build grids whose faces sit on real fault and horizon surfaces, so faults are modeled as the flow features they are. It is a core capability for faulted oil & gas and subsurface models.

Book a technical walkthrough

FAQ

Common questions

Why are faults hard to grid?

A fault offsets layers, so different rock types are juxtaposed across it, and the fault rock has its own transmissibility. The grid has to represent a discontinuity, a juxtaposition, and a flow property all at the same place.

What is the difference between a conforming and a non-conforming fault grid?

A non-conforming grid stair-steps the fault and uses non-neighbor connections, so the true plane is never a face. A conforming grid places cell faces on the fault surface, making it a real internal boundary with its own transmissibility.

What is fault juxtaposition?

Juxtaposition is which layers end up face to face across a fault after offset. A permeable sand may sit against a sealing shale or against another sand, and that determines whether fluids can cross the fault at all.

Get started

Meshing shouldn’t be the hard part.

See how AutoMesh-Geo turns this into a solved step. Book a technical walkthrough with our team.